|
Post by mystic13 on Jun 2, 2023 14:19:36 GMT
The first Buddhist council is traditionally said to have been held just after Buddha's Parinirvana, and presided over by Mahākāśyapa, one of his most senior disciples, at Rājagṛha (today's Rajgir) with the support of king Ajātasattu. According to Charles Prebish, almost all scholars have questioned the historicity of this first council.[6]
Second Buddhist council and first schism. After an initial period of unity, divisions in the sangha or monastic community led to the first schism of the sangha into two groups: the Sthavira (Elders) and Mahasamghika (Great Sangha). Most scholars agree that the schism was caused by disagreements over points of vinaya (monastic discipline).[14] Over time, these two monastic fraternities would further divide into various Early Buddhist Schools.
|
|
|
Post by mystic13 on Jun 2, 2023 14:27:30 GMT
As any continue to look at the religious orders [over the millennium] one will see sub-orders and division [spring up] often as the next generation is inspired by new found insights. If any were to consider the insight that rests even in that, we could point to the inspiration of the senior order. It would be unlikely the elders of that order founded [in spiritual truth] would separate or divide in principle. It would rather be the followers of the order [seekers of power] that had begun to indoctrinate [the way of the order] that would cause the division. They would also be peers [of the new way] and the division would most likely fall between [the power struggle] of the two. The insight behind this is in regards to fathoming what has been gained of old verses what has been realized and gained in the new.
Here what can clearly be seen is a lack of fullness in the spirit. Even as no man [women] could fathom all things under the sun, with any developing insight, the inspired of those resting in the fullest of the divine spirit would find no cause for division. For anything that is lacking in any matter will surface solely in the incapacity to hold to the divine whereby the brotherhood [sisterhood] would fall from within or correct their lack of insight in any matter.
In fact, for any congregation who is not open to recognising [when] or [that] the divine mother reveals her insights only upon those who have sanctioned [hold true] will soon end [upon the death of the followers]. The truth is that if a fellowship has inspired new insights in the youth of the order that remains holding true to the consistency in the spirit, they should jump for joy by opening the path as the forerunners enticing the divine mother [in their truth] to present herself.
Remember, what is consistent in the spirit can be clearly seen and if not seen as such is unseen. Mother truly frowns on division of any kind, for she also is longing to be united with the Trinity that is the Divine. Should any challenge that comes from the under world present itself, the very challenge will be exposed soon enough by action of reason over spirit and truth.
What needs to be trusted here is that few religions today are eager to move from the indoctrination of their scripture. Even as much is shared regarding love and unity they are lacking in [spiritual love] that is founded upon the unconditional and uninhibited nature of truth. The perpetual spinning in this [dance] is clearly seen in the spirit. How sad is it that the spiritual inherent calling of the divine that turns their attention from the world [toward the divine] remains caught up so?
|
|
|
Post by mystic13 on Jun 3, 2023 14:59:50 GMT
The word "Torah" in Hebrew is derived from the root ירה, which in the hif'il conjugation means 'to guide' or 'to teach'.[11] The meaning of the word is therefore "teaching", "doctrine", or "instruction"; the commonly accepted "law" gives a wrong impression.[12] The Alexandrian Jews who translated the Septuagint used the Greek word nomos, meaning norm, standard, doctrine, and later "law". Greek and Latin Bibles then began the custom of calling the Pentateuch (five books of Moses) The Law. Other translational contexts in the English language include custom, theory, guidance,[13] or system.[14]
The term "Torah" is used in the general sense to include both Rabbinic Judaism's written law and Oral Law, serving to encompass the entire spectrum of authoritative Jewish religious teachings throughout history, including the Mishnah, the Talmud, the Midrash and more, and the inaccurate rendering of "Torah" as "Law"[15] may be an obstacle to understanding the ideal that is summed up in the term talmud torah (תלמוד תורה, "study of Torah").[5]
My journey showed clearly that if you are in pursuit of unconditional love and do not love the chosen of Israel, you will dance with the divine mother as she turns you around and around [dances with you] until you see the hypocrisy in your quest. Shalom!
|
|
|
Post by mystic13 on Jun 3, 2023 21:31:14 GMT
Christian Canon: Defined as a rule or a measuring rod!
The council of Laodicea AD 363-364….. the Latin version omit the canon list, yet it is considered that 26 New Testament books omitting revelations was listed… including 22 books of the old testament from the books of the Tanakh and several deuterocanonical books including 1 and 11 Esdras, the Book of Baruch and the Epistle of Jeremiah at the same time demonizing the Second book of Enoch.
The council of Rome AD 382…… contained 73 books
Council of Hippo AD 393………… contained a canon close to Modern Catholic, yet short of the Eastern Orthodox. The canon list approved at Hippo included six books later classed by Catholics as deuterocanonical books and by Protestants as Apocrypha; but also included, as 'two books of Ezra', the Old Latin books First Ezra and Second Ezra, of which only the latter would subsequently be found in the Catholic canon.
Council of Carthage AD 397......... It was also determined that besides the Canonical Scriptures nothing be read in the Church under the title of divine Scriptures. The Canonical Scriptures are these: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, Joshua the son of Nun, Judges, Ruth, four books of Kings, two books of Paraleipomena, Job, the Psalter, five books of Solomon, the books of the twelve prophets, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezechiel, Daniel, Tobit, Judith, Esther, two books of Esdras, two Books of the Maccabees. Of the New Testament: four books of the Gospels, one book of the Acts of the Apostles, thirteen Epistles of the Apostle Paul, one epistle of the same [writer] to the Hebrews, two Epistles of the Apostle Peter, three of John, one of James, one of Jude, one book of the Apocalypse of John.
Ah! The Christians! If you truly believe your faith is the path to salvation then you must also believe that the god [of this world] would be keen in the attack on this path. Should this explain in part the weight of these councils mentioned above, then most all would be in agreement to the passion thrown toward allowing it be in place while diminishing the results. This is a great coup, is it not? Let's agree that the Canon books are fine, only they have been stripped of the additional support of the Lord's teachings needed to move forward.
|
|
|
Post by mystic13 on Jun 3, 2023 21:34:07 GMT
Does anyone recall the three steps required under the divine that was clearly stated earlier regarding the path to salvation and Spiritual Love?
|
|
|
Post by mystic13 on Jun 4, 2023 12:20:03 GMT
Here's a true story that this one played with in a fictional manuscript. The true part of the story is that this one was inspired to offer a path for the young ladies relationship to prosper, it was also a test as to the depth of my insight. It also pointed to the fact that this one was beginning to trust the guidance of the spirit rising within.
A quick caution to the feminist... relax it is the reverses of what appears in ones reason.
It began:
After many years, as trust is instilled between any two souls, it was shared by one young lady that she was having reoccurring issues with her boyfriend. She admitted she was at odds end and without solution, pointing perhaps, toward the relationship breaking up. Positioned as no other before him, Rios asked if she would like to resolve the impasse and save the relationship. Rios pointed out that he asked the same question twice before as he walked out the door. It was on the third offering that the young lady with eyes opened wide, yet sensing a peculiar way or alternative measure she was beginning to trust, she stopped him and agreed.
Rios continued by asking her to remain seated and to listen carefully if she could without reaction. He knew what he was about to share would be guffawed, but he sensed she was "ready" to hear him out. He told her she was to ask her boyfriend to play out a skit, a vignette, over a 24 or 48 hour window, perhaps on a weekend. She was to calmly ask him if he would do so. Then, as she listened to her boyfriend’s protests that he needed to know what it was before agreeing, she was to gently tell him the following. "Well, during the next say 48 hours, during the entire weekend the skit is as follows. "I will do whatever you ask during that time, period. Yes, meaning whatever your desires are, you only need to ask, and I will do so unconditionally.
As any might imagine the exchange between us was in no small measure tested. She might dismiss this as nonsense and it would end, or as it was she who after being asked three times if she wished to solve her impasse, might now stay with it. It continues:
|
|
|
Post by mystic13 on Jun 4, 2023 12:26:05 GMT
After she settled down and the color subsided in her face, she offered that she was now certain he was eccentric in all matters as well as a little crazy. He smiled, and waited to see if she wanted to hear the reason behind why she would do such a thing. He asked her if she was ready to hear him out, and to try to hold any further objection until he was finished. She shrugged and said go on!
Rios began to tell her truly if anyone wants to be first, they must be the very last, much as a servant to begin a path of understanding. For the vignette she was to realize as much, one first serves in order for one day to master, in this way she would be enlightened to truly be as one with another. In the vignette her boyfriend would be deemed as the King, and as her King, the master in her household. She in return, would not just serve, but would be his Queen. She, as the queen, would be above all things in his kingdom (estate). He would also be her Lover and she his Beloved.
Rios added that he offers these terms of King and Queen as an example that she might understand. The fact of the matter is that the Queen (the Feminine) is the essence of water, while the King (Masculine) is the essence of earth. The one is never before or after the other. They simply are not the same even as they are equated as equals. Rios added, "What do you think would be harder, to be a Master, who must attend to every matter in his estate, or a servant, whom does no more than what they are told." "Further, for any Lover to court any beloved he must gain measures worthy of a lover." "He must present his status, education and manner of support toward his queen in order for his queen and beloved to accept or not."
|
|
|
Post by mystic13 on Jun 4, 2023 15:34:51 GMT
He continued: The King must prove to be righteous in his actions. In fact, he would be responsible from the moment he woke to the moment he slept, upon every matter in his kingdom and especially in his household. He would require to confide in his Queen, and discover her “every desire”, and to fulfill them unconditionally. Further, he would need to advise his Queen, that he would yield matters in confidence to her, giving her authority in matters she alone could attend to; matters he confesses he would not be equal to the task.
Yet, above all she was to insist that her boyfriend return to her only after he has spent at least 30 minutes defining the term righteousness in his mind. She then wished to listen to him, as he shared the various definitions goggled, at times as needed to read the text aloud to her, and address what he feels is behind the definition. She then is too boldly state, "If my King by definition is willing to present himself as a righteous man?" If yes! Rios said she could freely agree to the terms that he afore mentioned. He wished her good luck and left.
|
|
|
Post by mystic13 on Jun 4, 2023 15:49:33 GMT
The next entry is absolutely true. Cool, one used to say... very cool, in regards to the young couples relations. Note that the character [Rios} in the manuscript had seen the likes of this [he called pure intention] only once before. Perhaps we will consider going there sometime soon?
When they happened to meet sometime later she embraced him by giving a sincere hug and thank you. He asked what that was for and she said, “The play the vignette that you asked me to play out with my boyfriend.” Yes, he said! “Well she said it was wonderful... it is wonderful. We have never been so happy and so in love.” She continued, “They are able to share everything and they seldom carry any disagreement as they both are eager to accept the others point of view while simultaneously giving in to the other... until whatever it was no longer matters.” She looked deeply into his eyes with a radiance he was shocked to recognise. Nothing further was said, yet the twinkle in her eyes revealed a glimpse of a pure intention Rios had only seen once before as they parted ways.
Rios had chronicled that at that moment he knew! As he walked out the door the impulse of his joy was now treading towards a depth of insight that was unseen. His heart jumped as he contemplated an end to the transgressions that have been bound and torn between the sexes.
|
|
|
Post by mystic13 on Jun 5, 2023 11:32:34 GMT
As we move from chapter 1 to Chapter 9 here's were it landed.
Sanjay began slowly and deliberately; Miss Best my Grandfather Rios Cruz had ignited new insights with his Vignettes regarding relationships between two partners. I suspect you are aware of his work! He outlined during a series of vignettes that as the physicality of girls is transformed into womanhood at adolescence there is much more going on than what actually meets the eye. Let me begin by saying the transcendence of her being into womanhood is truly multi-faceted. Miss Kelsey as spiritualist explored the nature of duality in mankind, in one world, one people and one creation, humanity has the ability to choose. They categorized the quality and value of people’s choices into two categories or two consciousnesses. The first we could call the duality consciousness is fundamentally driven by the ego (splitting) conscious; we could call the [soul] consciousness of reason. Secondly, there is a spirit consciousness that is inspired not from reason and the soul but from the spirit in the divine. In fact, it begins with the reunion of the divine as the divine mother is rekindled from within as the focus with the divine father is awakened with the union of the two. In, time spiritual love is built up and the spirit consciousness follows the son. Hence, we can say that the ego consciousness is a state bound to duality whereby the spiritual consciousness collapses the two, uniting the two [in self] into one, in a state resting let’s say, in the freedom of non-duality.
|
|
|
Post by mystic13 on Jun 5, 2023 11:39:16 GMT
Miss Kelsey, non-duality’s true desire is unity consciousness—being connected with everything and everyone in the present moment. There are no judgments, only awareness, which ultimately leads to the infinite love of the Divine. The same conditions or un-conditions are required in Marriage. Now consider all women who transcend into womanhood. By her nature she is her own person, a friend, a colleague a wife and ultimately a beloved. Five parts that make up the whole!
1. She is both wife and mistress. Here she is both a wife to her husband and mistress in the dominion of her home. She is therefore true in her love while she is contrived toward the well being of her household and family. 2.) She is the absolute of creation. Without her, neither man nor the all of creation can fully rest in peace. Yet she must exhibit patience and wisdom beyond her years, subdued in her nature to wait for love beyond convenience and in lieu of her desires. 3.) She needs upright teaching regarding the sanctity of marriage as well as when to lead and when to follow, often apart from the instinct in her heart’s desire. 4.) She, in her most glorious splendor, elevated as the betrothed must at the same time decide when to surrender in acceptance to her lover, yielding her position to become as the beloved. 5.) She must remember the passion of her libido, within her acceptance to her lover, remembering to stir her desire upon the loins of her lover. Sanjay went on to say, “It is only in her true acceptance beyond convenience and manipulation can she be freed from her duality and unite her spirit as one. For the heart has to be cleansed from all that serves. The mind needs to be free from manipulation and unjust consequence in order to free from what binds. Then and only then can she remain uninhibited and unconditional to herself and her lover. Here the path points toward the final destination that can be seen once from afar, now kindled closely on new born horizons. Sophie began to stir in her seat, “Yet, Miss Kelsey it is not as you think.”
|
|
|
Post by mystic13 on Jun 5, 2023 11:43:36 GMT
Sanjay continued, “Miss Kelsey, Please consider: the lover has lost his way, as any measure of pure intent is devoted, he is seeking to return in relationship to the divine, and cannot. Yet, one who seeks unity with his beloved... is as if the lover has reconciled in the divine. In fact, it is as close as the lover will ever become.” “Only the beloved cannot be fully obtained. For in moments like these... she is like God, one who is in spite of being near, remains far off and alludes capture the moment someone is about to grab hold of her. The lover must be compelled to completely loose himself in order to regain unity in the divine. “Only with his beloved... can he do this, for only the beloved, can elevate her lover toward the ecstasy that is lost in spirit and the very measure needed to facilitate the yearning from within.” It is said, “The woman is the cornerstone of the material world and man’s intermediary to the extraordinary world. Her love permits the man to experience the attaining of the extraordinary world. Sanjay concluded, “It is here where the lover is as vulnerable as the beloved when she gives up herself in the passions of her acceptance and her fate is in the hands of her lover. It is a time when their wills are no longer their own. It is here where they are as one.”
|
|
|
Post by mystic13 on Jun 6, 2023 11:33:11 GMT
continued, Looking deeper we find the Apocrypha teaches the depth of this inherency is founded upon reason. Reason is born of the soul! It would be beneficial to clarify this above. If one is truly looking deeper the inherency from within, lets say the presence within... is a longing that overlays upon our reason but does not reveal itself. Should any add and subtract all the gains and losses in one's life, a presence can be felt that leaves one unfinished or unsatisfied. Perhaps an overstatement to say [inherency is founded upon reason]. In review, the teachings [Apocrypha] expose or reveal the presence of so much more that cannot be seen... as is not revealed to the soul [reason]. Yes! It is much better to say the inherency is founded [overlaying] upon reason! Consider this from the Gospel or Bartholomew: 6 And Bartholomew said: Lord, when thou wentest to be hanged upon the cross, I followed thee afar off and saw thee hung upon the cross, and the angels coming down from heaven and worshipping thee. And when there came darkness, 7 I beheld, and I saw thee that thou wast vanished away from the cross and I heard only a voice in the parts under the earth, and great wailing and gnashing of teeth on a sudden. Tell me, Lord, whither wentest thou from the cross? 8 And Jesus answered and said: Blessed art thou, Bartholomew, my beloved, because thou sawest this mystery, and now will I tell thee all things whatsoever thou askest me. 9 For when I vanished away from the cross, then went I down into Hades that I might bring up Adam and all them that were with him, according to the supplication [: to make a humble appeal. especially : to pray to God. : to ask earnestly and humbly], of Michael the archangel.
|
|
|
Post by mystic13 on Jun 6, 2023 12:00:03 GMT
Who has not seen the affluent, powerful on a grand stage, Gates, Musk, Zuckerberg or the Saudi prince such as MBS. Surely there is no divorce, discord, or failings in their relations. Is it not true that each and every day they are embellished in joy, peace and love from the moment they awake till they fall fast asleep soundly at night? Didn't King Solomon explain this fully... chasing after the wind!
So if one should discover the inherency [that overlays within] can then this mentioned above be achieved?
|
|
|
Post by mystic13 on Jun 7, 2023 9:39:01 GMT
Try to imagine in your reason that a special effort has been instated in the creation of man. Those who are alive today are among those who have been the strongest re-births and show the most promise of those that remain. Now in this reason you do feel there is much more just by your very existence. Then unlike the treadmill of religion that has been stalled you wish to explore more. Only this last final time you truly seek results. The time is now! Oddly enough its because of this internet that spun with so much debauchery it could contain generations of exploitation and evil. Now that is a great coup isn't it?
|
|
|
Post by mystic13 on Jun 8, 2023 15:23:54 GMT
Now try to imagine for those in spirit what measure of special effort can be instated in the creation of man who has risen upon the immortal. That there are those who are alive today that have risen to the promise. Here, it is realized that the treadmill of religion remains entrenched, a repeat... much as the Pharisee's in scripture. Further, even as the time is now, the ones who will receive this message will come from that same primordial soup that is lost to the internet. In reason, such things simply can't be fathomed!
|
|
|
Post by mystic13 on Jun 9, 2023 11:03:01 GMT
There could be no greater calling then to unveil and [walk the path] that reunites the divine trinity. Can you think of any greater purpose for mankind? As any turns from the world and calls to the Father [1.].They are then guided to cleanse there souls [reason] by freeing the heart, resting the mind upon the self... with all their strength to raise the divine mother within[2.]. Then finally building up in spiritual love that connects and is oiled upon the unconditional nature that freely follows the son. [3.]
The revelation of these three steps after death is the birth to the gnawing and gnashing of teeth that is expressed in scripture. If you try to imagine that any could have gained as one in the immortal indissoluble that raises you from the second death... one begins to see. Note to self [to be avoided at all cost]
What say you??
|
|
|
Post by mystic13 on Jun 11, 2023 12:02:28 GMT
Blessings!
Should one talk about spiritual love when the matters of the world hold a veil over those who have failed or cannot move in that direction. If the divine has been lifted within and the presence of love has been revealed [love never before imagined], yet, being built up in spiritual love is still a ways off, how should we sit and talk with others who have not?
Is there any chance for dialogue here?
|
|
|
Post by mystic13 on Jun 13, 2023 13:38:30 GMT
Here's a shout out to those who are founded as followers of Christ. When the Lord was speaking to the 12 he moved a motion that if you loved me you would keep my command. My command is to love each other as I have loved you. Now, who do you think that heard this first hand, kind of thought "Yes! He understands me. That's me!" They were in the presence of the Son of God the Messiah! Yet, they were pushed beyond the scope of their reason to a place away or outside of it. They would know [in their own testimony] of times that they were far from this love [in their reason] and such testimony would carry a very heavy weight.
The Lord followed up with "I will not leave you comfortless." If a man love me, he will keep my words: and the Father will love him and we will come on to him and make our abode with him. The caveat here is that he said, "25 These things have I spoken unto you, being yet present with you." He was pointing to the fact that [it was by] having the living Son of God in your presence, listening, watching [miracles] and feeling the radiance of his love, would enable them to be moved past this heavy weight. This would only occur if they could [empty themselves] from their reason... by being overpowered by this radiance. This would accomplish the first measure of their salvation.
It is here that he draws on his Father to present the twelve with the Holy Spirit. Judas asked, not Iscariot, "How [is it] they will manifest onto us and not onto the world? The Lord answered, "You have heard me say I will go away and come again onto you." If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I.
It was by the atonement of sin in the resurrection that freed the Spirit of Truth enabling her to rise from within, only now she will not just rise but be reconciled onto the Father. Then only will the world have the presence to rejoice in the unconditional love that now truly follows the Lord and lives in the Trinity of the Divine.
Anyone??
|
|
|
Post by mystic13 on Jun 16, 2023 12:16:46 GMT
As the gospels of the Nag Hammadi were being shared recently, the tempter screamed out, "Why do you think the gospel of Philip is right." The spirit in me, appealed to the one who said it... as the sister was eager to follow Jesus and her reason was being pushed to its limits. You know were that comes from. It certainly was not you. She stopped cold in her rebuttal. This revelation points to the method that is drawn upon to confuse and stall the joining of the soul [reason] with the spirit.
When the Lord spoke to Peter [Secret gospel of James] and told him he needed to be filled, Peter said, You have said this 3 times... but we are already filled. This as well was the brother being tempted by the tempter to hold on to his reason. This is the triumph of salvation really. To be exposed [when the grip of reason is hanging on by a thread] the forces that are opposed to you moving onto the immortal plain are ruthless in their attack. BEWARE of anything that forwards such divisive attacks. They are isolated not by the rebuttal in reason, but by letting the spirit stand up until it has been deflected.
Why do you suppose the attack was so acute? In truth the Nag Hammadi scriptures have NOT been counselled/revised by interpreting scribes over the revisionist times and the teachings in the early/dark ages. This is comforting really... as the initial shock is abated. 😒
|
|
|
Post by mystic13 on Jun 17, 2023 14:05:52 GMT
The Testimony of Truth
The foolish - thinking in their heart that if they confess, "We are Christians," in word only (but) not with power, while giving themselves over to ignorance, to a human death, not knowing where they are going nor who Christ is, thinking that they will live, when they are (really) in error - hasten towards the principalities and authorities. They fall into their clutches because of the ignorance that is in them. For (if) only words which bear testimony were effecting salvation, the whole world would endure this thing and would be saved. But it is in this way that they drew error to themselves. ...
...in word only (but) not with power.
And he gave command to himself; he began to know himself and to speak with his mind, which is the father of the truth, concerning the unbegotten aeons, and concerning the virgin who brought forth the light. And he thinks about the power which flowed over the whole place, and which takes hold of him. And he is a disciple of his mind, which is male.
He began to keep silent within himself until the day when he should become worthy to be received above. He rejects for himself loquacity (talking a great deal) and disputations (debate), and he endures the whole place; and he bears up under them, and he endures all of the evil things.
And he is patient with every one; he makes himself equal to every one, and he also separates himself from them. And that which someone wants, he brings to him, in order that he might become perfect (and) holy. When the [...], he grasped him, having bound him upon [...], and he was filled with wisdom. He bore witness to the truth [...] the power, and he went into Imperishability, the place whence he came forth, having left the world, which has the appearance of the night, and those that whirl the stars in it. This, therefore, is the true testimony: When man comes to know himself and God, who is over the truth, he will be saved, and he will crown himself with the crown unfading.
|
|
|
Post by mystic13 on Jun 22, 2023 10:12:49 GMT
The path for man to know himself was outlined in this the "Two Paths". What path are you On? Do you know?
|
|
|
Post by mystic13 on Jun 24, 2023 22:03:57 GMT
The Apocryphon of James
Quote" Become earnest about the word! For as to the word, its first part is faith; the second, love; the third, works; for from these comes life. For the word is like a grain of wheat; when someone had sown it, he had faith in it; and when it had sprouted, he loved it, because he had seen many grains in place of one. And when he had worked, he was saved, because he had prepared it for food, (and) again he left (some) to sow. So also can you yourselves receive the kingdom of heaven; unless you receive this through knowledge, you will not be able to find it." end Quote
Faith is turning from the world, the second is being born again and seeing unconditional love for the first time, third is building up spiritual love. The works is seen, in part, in this thread! For those of you who are starting your journey, each step reduces the depth of your reason until you are willing to let it go, yet this is an internal quest. One should not follow this cult or that. If you are enticed to do so... remember the inherent longing that is born to reason is of divine origin. Raise the feminine within and she will guide you. If you are stalled in any way, she is calling you to ask her to overcome whatever is binding.
|
|
|
Post by mystic13 on Jun 25, 2023 12:13:39 GMT
In truth cults/religions etc. is an appeal to this inherency we feel from within. There is really little mystery discerning this. Mankind is an aberration to all manner of life on the planet. The greatest coup [of the god of this world] is for man to believe that he/she evolved from something that was offered and supported by nature. That as nature grows she somehow laid in place ecosystems that would support mutations and evolving species, when in fact the chaos that was presented by the events of the world stood in stark opposition to mans evolution. Polar ice cap reversals, glacial advances and retreats, while nothing points to managing mutating species that does not call on any form of building up of humanity. In fact humanity probably would not survive a 5 degree mean temperature change on earth. Even as greater extremes happened every 20 thousand to 100 thousand years.
Thoughts!
|
|
|
Post by mystic13 on Jun 26, 2023 9:37:07 GMT
In truth cults/religions etc. is an appeal to this inherency we feel from within. There is really little mystery discerning this. Mankind is an aberration to all manner of life on the planet. The greatest coup [of the god of this world] is for man to believe that he/she evolved from something that was offered and supported by nature. That as nature grows she somehow laid in place ecosystems that would support mutations and evolving species, when in fact the chaos that was presented by the events of the world stood in stark opposition to [mans] or any evolution. Polar ice cap reversals, glacial advances and retreats, while nothing points to managing mutating species that does not call on any form of building up of humanity. In fact humanity probably would not survive a 5 degree mean temperature change on earth. Even as greater extremes happened every 20 thousand to 100 thousand years. Thoughts!
|
|